Ballernundsaufen
0xf01d077f7047035b6e3d81204b54b184243e5700
- Realised P&L
- $0.00
- Volume
- $4.0k
- Markets traded
- 40
- Open portfolio
- $1.7k
Can you copy this trader?
unrealistic — Multiple hard blockers. Interesting to watch, but mirroring this would not reproduce its returns.
These checks compare a wallet’s past record against thresholds chosen by hand. They are not measurements, and none has been tested against out-of-sample returns — that needs the backtester. Every signal looks backwards.
What was checked
- BlockerEdge per dollar0.0%
- Thinner than the spread a taker crosses. Whatever this wallet is doing, a follower's worse fills would erase it — the profit comes from volume, not from a per-trade advantage you could inherit.
- ClearMarkets traded40
- Enough decisions to look like a method, few enough that each one is followable.
- BlockerProfit concentration56.7% from one position
- Most of the sampled profit is a single bet. That is a record of one outcome, not evidence of a repeatable method — and you cannot copy a bet that already resolved.
- CautionSettled sample11 positions
- Too few settled positions to distinguish skill from luck. Any win rate here is noise.
- Not knownWin rate (sample)54.5%
- Deliberately unscored. Win rate says nothing without position sizing — selling longshots wins often and loses big, buying them does the reverse.
- ClearOpen concentration19.0% in top position
- Open risk is spread across several positions.
Largest open positions
Biggest settled wins
A highlight reel, excluded from every check above — measuring a wallet against its own best trades reports a 100% win rate for everyone.
- +$28.92at 0.614Will Alphabet’s market capitalization be less than $3.50T at the end of October 2026?
- +$9.20at 0.847Democratic Senate odds 66-68% on November 1?
- +$4.80at 0.760Democratic Senate odds 64-66% on October 31?
- +$3.00at 0.850Democratic Senate odds <60% on October 31?
- +$2.80at 0.860Democratic Senate odds 64-66% on November 1?